Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collection Oriented Programming: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Craig Stuntz (talk | contribs) m →[[PageName]]: Should be Collection Oriented Programming |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
===[[Collection Oriented Programming]]===
[[WP:NEO|Protologism]], [[WP:OR|original research]]. [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Collection+Oriented+Programming%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&hs=nWX&lr=&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&start=30&sa=N 27 unique Google hits], including author's home page and some WP mirrors. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collection_Oriented_Programming&action=history Article author] has this to say on [http://www.geocities.com/tablizer/top.htm his personal page]: "Thus, I am here trying to sell the dream and vision of perhaps what should be called 'collection-oriented-programming.' I found it a more powerful metaphore than anything else on the market, and I hope you will too." [[User:Craig Stuntz|Craig Stuntz]] 12:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
This seems more a complaint about the colloquial nature of blogs than the topic at hand. If somebody says, "Lisp is fricken cool and runs circles around other languages!", that is NOT a reason to delete Lisp topics. The above cited page is not even directly linked to by "collection oriented programming".
|