Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collection Oriented Programming: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 4:
This seems more a complaint about the colloquial nature of blogs than the topic at hand. If somebody says, "Lisp is fricken cool and runs circles around other languages!", that is NOT a reason to delete Lisp topics. The above cited page is not even directly linked to by "collection oriented programming", and thus appears more of a complaint about the author's personal blog or blog style than of the wikipedia topic content itself.
If you want to argue that the name is not in common-enough usage to justify an article, that is another matter. As the case is stated above, '''I question the objectivity of the complaint.'''▼
Protologism complaints may not apply to computer-related topics because print publications are not where ideas are formed and shaped about software anymore. The web has largely replaced formal software journals, for good or bad. ▼
▲Protologism complaints may not apply to computer-related topics because print publications are not where ideas are formed and shaped about software anymore. The web has largely replaced formal software journals, for good or bad.
▲If you want to argue that the name is not in common-enough usage to justify an article, that is another matter. As the case is stated, '''I question the objectivity of the complaint.'''
"Collection oriented programming" is simply a name that encompasses a wide variety of tools and languages. It was not coined by the author of the above page.
| |||