Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shen (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
noteavote |
→Shen (programming language): rm extra (UTC) in spa tag |
||
Line 29:
** Both books are self-published books by the language's designer and thus do not help to establish notability. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 12:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
* '''strong keep''' Shen is different from Qi. For one it has a different set of primitives from Qi. It's a successor in the same sense SBCL is a successor of CMUCL and they have their own entries. Furthermore it has transitioned to a BSD license. The comments regarding licence made by [[User:Hga|Hga]] are no longer applicable. <small>— [[User:68.184.193.46|68.184.193.46]] ([[User talk:68.184.193.46|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/68.184.193.46|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. The preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment was added at 01:57, 7 March 2015
::"''Furthermore it has transitioned to a BSD license.''" Operative word there is 'a', as in "a BSD licence", [http://www.shenlanguage.org/license.pdf see for yourself one version of the modifications] (the master license.pdf as distributed by the sources hasn't actually been changed since the first release, but it's still modified in the same style). It does no one any good to pretend this is a clean BSD license when anyone can see that's not the case by downloading it. And my greater point that wonky licencing caused Qi and Shen to be stillborn still holds. ''Maybe'' the license change will result in significant uptake and eventual notability, but that's not true now. If that happens the Shen Wikipedia page can be reborn. [[User:Hga|Hga]] ([[User talk:Hga|talk]]) 11:16, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
| |||