Talk:Builder pattern: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 203:
</blockquote>
 
....which seems to have nothing to do with the purpose of the pattern, which is about specifying numerous optional arguments to a constructor by name. NowIn the above paragraph it sounds like they're talking about being able to create a big endian representation of an integer or a string representation of the same integer with the same constructor class.
 
None of the code examples show a class that creates objects that offer different representations of the same value. All of the examples show classes that can selectively fill in member variables of the object that is about to be created. An object which only has one representation.