Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Header: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:41, 19 March 2015

Revision as of 09:25, 1 July 2015

Line 18:

To make an enforcement request, click on the link above this box and supply all required information. To appeal a discretionary sanction or other enforcement decision, please create a new section and use the template {{tl|Arbitration enforcement appeal}}.

{{cot|Important: Appeals and administrator modifications of sanctions}}

{{hat|Information for administrators processing requests}}

:* If you participate on this page you should be prepared to mete out potentially long term bans and you should expect reactive behavior from those banned.

:* In March 2010, the [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] passed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&diff=prev&oldid=349939789 a motion] which stated that administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except:

::*(a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or

::*(b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as [[WP:AN]] or [[WP:ANI]]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|proper page]].

:*Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee.

Note: On 3 May 2014, the [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] updated its [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&oldid=606947133#Motion:_Appeals_and_modifications procedures by motion]. These state that:

'''Appeals by sanctioned editors'''<p>

Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. The process has three possible stages (see "Important notes" below). The editor may:

# ask the enforcing administrator to reconsider their original decision;

# request review at the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] ("AE") or at the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard|administrators’ noticeboard]] ("AN"); and

# submit a request for amendment at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment|"ARCA"]]. If the editor is blocked, the appeal may be made by email through [[User:Arbitration Committee|Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee]] (or, if email access is revoked, to {{NonSpamEmail|arbcom-l|2=lists.wikimedia.org}}).

;Modifications by administrators'''<p>

No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without:

# the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or

# prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" below).

Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped. Nothing in this section prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied.

'''Important notes''':<p>

# For a request to succeed, either

::(i) the clear and substantial consensus of (a) uninvolved administrators at AE or (b) uninvolved editors at AN or

::(ii) a passing motion of arbitrators at ARCA

::is required. If consensus at AE or AN is unclear, the status quo prevails.

# <li value="2"> While asking the enforcing administrator and seeking reviews at AN or AE are not mandatory prior to seeking a decision from the committee, once the committee has reviewed a request, further substantive review at any forum is barred. The sole exception is editors under an active sanction who may still request an easing or removal of the sanction on the grounds that said sanction is no longer needed, but such requests may only be made once every six months, or whatever longer period the committee may specify.

# These provisions apply only to discretionary sanctions placed by administrators and to blocks placed by administrators to enforce arbitration case decisions. They do not apply to sanctions directly authorised by the committee, and enacted either by arbitrators or by arbitration clerks, or to special functionary blocks of whatever nature.

{{cob}}

{{hatcot|Information for administrators processing requests}}

:* If you participate on this page you should be prepared to mete out potentially long term bans and you should expect reactive behavior from those banned.

:*Administrators who consistently make questionable enforcement administrative actions, or whose actions are consistently overturned by community or Arbitration Committee discussions may be asked to cease performing such activities or be formally restricted from taking such activities.

:* The enforcement measures in arbitration cases should be construed liberally in order to protect Wikipedia and keep it running efficiently. Not all enforcement requests will show behavior restricted by ArbCom. It may, however, violate other Wikipedia policies and guidelines which you may use administrative discretion to deal with.

Line 30 ⟶ 48:

:* Once an issue is resolved, enclose it between {{tl|hat}} and {{tl|hab}} tags, after which a bot should archive it in 3 days.

:*You can use the templates {{tl|uw-aeblock}} (for blocks) or {{tl|AE sanction}} (for other discretionary sanctions) to give notice of sanctions on user talk pages.

{{habcob}}

}}</span>

{{Arbitration enforcement/Archive navbox}}