Revision as of 09:33, 26 March 2015 edit Margin1522 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 11,033 edits →Nim (programming language): d no RS sources ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:10, 26 March 2015 edit undo Northamerica1000 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 708,152 edits Listing at WP:DELSORT under Computing (FWDS) Next edit →
Line 10: ::That's a very good point. I agree that the [http://www.drdobbs.com/jvm/the-rise-and-fall-of-languages-in-2013/240165192 other Dr. Dobbs article] isn't enough for GNG, and I too have been unsuccessful at finding any other sources, so I've switched to "delete". This article can always be reinstated if/when there are reliable and independent sources available. — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius\|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius\|♪ talk ♪]]</sup> 06:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC) '''Delete''' per Mr. Stradivarius. I couldn't find any RS sources either. The test for programming languages seems to be whether they are actually being used by anyone other than the creators. If and when it's used to write actual software and has some RS sources then it could be reinstated. – [[User:Margin1522\|Margin1522]] ([[User talk:Margin1522\|talk]]) 09:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC) :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing\|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Northamerica1000\|N<font size="-2">ORTH</font> A<font size="-2">MERICA</font>]]<sup><font size="-2">[[User_talk:Northamerica1000\|1000]]</font></sup> 10:10, 26 March 2015 (UTC)</small>

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nim (programming language): Difference between revisions