Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nim (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 129:
:::::::{{Reply to|Padenton}} Wikipedia policies for establishing the notability of a programming language or such technology are simply insane, and I refuse to abide by such insanity, although it may have merit for other articles. Linking users to policies doesn't change the fact that the policies are stupid. --[[User:IO Device|IO Device]] ([[User talk:IO Device|talk]]) 19:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
::::::::{{Reply to|IO Device}} Not sure what to tell you. ―<span style="background:#8FF;border:solid 1px;border-radius:8px;box-shadow:darkgray 2px 2px 2px"> [[User:Padenton|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;color:#C00">Padenton</span>]]|[[User talk:Padenton|✉]] </span> 19:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
:::::::{{Reply to|Padenton}} Sorry my IP is changed. I should probably register. I just want to make something clear first. I'm a random programmer from Russia and English isn't my first language. I did not contribute anything to Nim. I do not have any agenda. However I invested a month of my life into coding in Nim at my job, which is an animation studio. I was very impressed with Nim and especially its macros and compile time code execution. There aren't that many languages that can do this. Nim's metaprogramming capabilities are extremely noteworthy, and people really do find it fascinating https://duckduckgo.com/?q=nimrod+metaprogramming I personally find the language very interesting and I don't understand why an encyclopedia shouldn't have an article about the language. Nim's compiler itself is actually very notable: it's a large project, it's written in Nim, and there aren't many other languages that can match its features. Removal of this article would make Wikipedia worse and nothing else. [[Special:Contributions/46.72.203.44|46.72.203.44]] ([[User talk:46.72.203.44|talk]]) 21:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
| |||