Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nim (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Nim (programming language): Canvassed comment. |
→arbitrary break: link, please, to support the canvassing charge? |
||
Line 185:
*'''Delete''' I'm not really convinced by the SPA keep votes who were canvassed. I think it really fails GNG and it cites a lot of sources that aren't really reliable anyway. The deleters above have made a much more convincing argument. <span style="text-shadow:#A2E1FC 2px 2px 9px;">— [[User:Kikichugirl|<font face="Palatino Linotype" color="#000000">kikichugirl</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kikichugirl|<font color="#8A37F0">oh hello!</font>]]</sup></span> 21:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
::The above comment is a result of canvassing in #wikipedia-en, and must be discounted for the same reasons noted in the comment. Or are we saying the canvassing has been unbiased? --[[User:IO Device|IO Device]] ([[User talk:IO Device|talk]]) 22:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
:::When you charge canvassing, you need to provide a link to the diff, please. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 22:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
| |||