Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halide (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate, result was no consensus |
Malcolmxl5 (talk | contribs) m removed Category:Relisted AfD debates using HotCat |
||
Line 16:
* '''Comment''' The 2013 PLDI published about this has already attracted 68 citation. This one might be a keep. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 11:27, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Joe Decker|j⚛e decker]][[User talk:Joe Decker|<sup><small><i>talk</i></small></sup>]] 00:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
* '''Comment''' The article clearly needs some expansion and doesn't pass [[WP:GNG]] with flying colours. However, there is no promotional wording in the article (admittedly because it is a [[WP:Stub|stub]]). My gut feeling is that it is notable, but unfortunately no independent [[WP:RELIABLE|reliable sources]] have been published to fully back this up. The language's [https://github.com/halide/Halide GitHub repository] has 933 stars and 114 watchers so is used to a certain extent and is [https://github.com/halide/Halide/commits/master actively maintained]. As pointed out above there are publications ([http://people.csail.mit.edu/jrk/halide12/halide12.pdf 1] and [http://people.csail.mit.edu/jrk/halide-pldi13.pdf 2]) by [[MIT]] about the article. — [[User:JordanMussi|Jordan Mussi]] ([[User talk:JordanMussi|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JordanMussi|contribs]]) 13:59, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 12:33, 15 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
* '''Comment''' Keep. It has been published in a respectable conference proceedings and introduces some unique concepts. Time will tell whether it is historically influential, but I think it is notable enough to keep for now. Perhaps it could be merged into some other general article on this class of language, but I don't have any immediate thoughts on where. [[Special:Contributions/58.182.250.23|58.182.250.23]] ([[User talk:58.182.250.23|talk]]) 16:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
| |||