Utente:Lory Tek/Sandbox: differenze tra le versioni

Versione delle 18:52, 19 lug 2014

Versione delle 18:54, 19 lug 2014

Riga 57:

The 5.7×28mm projectile potentially poses less risk of [[collateral damage]] than conventional pistol bullets, because the projectile design limits overpenetration, as well as risk of [[ricochet]].<ref name="cutshaw2006"/><ref name="humphries2008"/> The lightweight projectile loses much of its [[kinetic energy]] after traveling only 400 m (437&nbsp;yd), whereas a conventional pistol bullet such as the 9×19mm retains significant energy beyond 800 m (875&nbsp;yd), posing greater risk of collateral damage in the event of a miss.<ref name="dockery2007"/> This range exceeds the engagement distances expected for the 5.7×28mm cartridge's intended applications, so the cartridge's limited energy at long range is not considered to be disadvantageous.<ref name="dockery2007"/> Since the SS190 projectile does not rely on fragmentation or the expansion of a [[hollow point bullet|hollow point]], the cartridge (and 5.7×28mm weapons) is considered suitable for military use under the [[Hague Convention of 1899]], which prohibits the use of expanding bullets in warfare.<ref name="bahde2009"/>

{| class="wikitable" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"

|+ Ballistic performance summary for various 5.7×28mm cartridges

|-

Riga 68:

|-

! [[Projectile]] weight

| align=center1center|1,8 g (28 gr)

| align=center|2,6 g (40 gr)

| align=center|2,6 g (40 gr)