|
<div style="clear:both;" class="NavFrame">
<div class="NavHead" style="text-align:left; height:6em; font-size:100%;">
<font color=green>QUESTION D</font><br/>Gregorian chant isOnly the best-known repertoryranges of plainchant,''L. araniformis'' formand of''L. monophonic,castanea'' <br/>unaccompaniedoverlap sacred song, which was developed inwith the CatholicGreen Church, mainly inand <br/>westernGolden andBell centralFrog, Europe duringand the periodgeneral 800–1000,body withshape laterand additionscolouration andare redactionssimilar.</div>
</div>
<div class="NavContent" style="text-align:left; display: none;">
<b><font color=green>HINT</font><br/></b>
*Are the two ideas close enough to be glued together like this?
*A good ___location for a break is about half-way through (see the <font color=crimson>red text</font> below).
*You ''could'' start your new, second sentence with “This ...”.
*However, being singular, “this” could refer back to any of the four singular items in the first <br/>sentence: “Gregorian chant”, “best-known repertory”, “plainchant”, or “a form of monophonic, <br/>unaccompanied sacred song”. That would be very fuzzy.
*To make it clear, you’ll need to restate one of these items at the start of your new sentence.
<br/><b>Gregorian chant is the best-known repertory of plainchant, a form of monophonic, <br/>unaccompanied sacred so<font color=crimson>ng, which</font> was developed in the Catholic Church, mainly in <br/>western and central Europe during the period 800–1000, with later additions and redactions.
</div>
</div>
| 