Revision as of 15:22, 20 August 2015 edit Psychonaut (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 31,734 edits I have completed this malformed nomination and inserted it into today's list of nominations. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:05, 20 August 2015 edit undo LinguistAtLarge (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 10,333 edits Keep Next edit →
Line 7: * '''Keep''' The term is commonly used and there are sources. The article never calls it a software development philosophy. More could be added, but AfD isn't the route to go to get those. I'm not sure why nominator stated that in nomination rational. I checked StickyMinds.com and there are many sources there, unfortunately most are restricted to members (I am one and membership is free). A simple Google search shows sever RSes in the first ten returned. [[User:Walter Görlitz\|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz\|talk]]) 05:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC) * '''Comment'''. I have completed this incomplete and malformed nomination and inserted it into today's list of nominations. —[[User:Psychonaut\|Psychonaut]] ([[User talk:Psychonaut\|talk]]) 15:22, 20 August 2015 (UTC) * '''Keep''' "Cowboy coding" is not simply a generic "cowboy-" prefix/adjective applied to "coding" as the nominator suggests. It is an established concept in the realm of software development. A Google book search for [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22cowboy+coding%22&tbm=bks "cowboy coding"] returns 275 hits, many of which are reliable sources establishing [[WP:N\|notability]]. —<b style="border:1px solid #C5BE83;background-color:#F5DEB3;font-size:0.9em;"> [[User:LinguistAtLarge\|LinguistAtLarge]] • [[User talk:LinguistAtLarge\|Talk]] </b> 18:05, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cowboy coding: Difference between revisions