Content deleted Content added
Fruitloop11 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 510:
:::Also you are going against [[WP:ONUS]] which states, "Consensus may determine that certain information does not improve an article". The amount of policies you have broken on Wikipedia is Astounding--[[User:Fruitloop11|Fruitloop11]] ([[User talk:Fruitloop11|talk]]) 23:22, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
::My previous comments notwithstanding, I agree that a discussion of typical and maximum length/size is of keen interest to readers and should be included in the article. I just think we need to strive to provide the most realistic and useful information that we can, add all appropriate caveats, and be careful to avoid tabloid-level reliance on dubious unverifiable reports that stretch the bounds of credulity. —[[User:BarrelProof|BarrelProof]] ([[User talk:BarrelProof|talk]]) 06:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
:::: I have read your source. but I'm not telling the first word of the 3rd page, because you are trying your hardest to humiliate me, and it's not gonna work. I've dealt with a lot of people like you. Your source is still there I just removed it from the lead, which makes sense cause the size should be in the description not the lead. I've also found out that snake experts at the [[University of Michigan]] accepts the 32 foot 9 1/2 inch record (http://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Python_reticulatus/). It's funny you have this big PH.D, but you still don't know how to compromise. You keep stating the same silliness over and over again without making any changes to the article, and at the same time trying to belittle me for not agreeing with your source or wanting a better source.--[[User:Fruitloop11|Fruitloop11]] ([[User talk:Fruitloop11|talk]]) 23:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
| |||