Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart File System: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:30, 7 October 2015

Revision as of 01:51, 10 October 2015

Line 27:

* '''Keep''' As a general guidelines, I would agree that notability isn't inherited from a parent entity. But part of an enterprise like Wikipedia is a certain level of completeness. If I can find out every release date of Amiga and a changelog on that page, but not get any detail about a file system that ran on it, something is wrong. I would agree to a proposal to cut back some of the needlessly gory detail on the Amiga page and merge things like this article in, but the content on this page is worth keeping around and is in keeping with the other topics in this area.--[[Special:Contributions/69.204.153.39|69.204.153.39]] ([[User talk:69.204.153.39|talk]]) 20:53, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

*: While my vote is also to keep, I disagree that it would be practical to merge this with [[Amiga]], as if we put every relevant filesystem there, that article would become quite a mess. Independent article is right in my opinion. [[User:LjL|LjL]] ([[User talk:LjL|talk]]) 12:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' - Doesn't pass notability criteria, and searches turned up nothing to suggest it does. Arguments to keep above, while passionate and well-thought out, are not policy based. [[User:onel5969|<b><font color="#536895">Onel</font><font color="#FFB300">5969</font></b>]] ^{[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]} 01:51, 10 October 2015 (UTC)