Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart File System: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
There is no consensus to delete |
consensus is consensus |
||
Line 33:
:I'd say that since "a clear majority is in favor of keeping", and the current state of thing is that the article exists, there is '''no consensus to delete'''. Given that, I think at this point you're twisting process, and it's interesting that other filesystem-related articles that were AfD'd were hastily deleted (even though they were receiving sources and improvements), this one is being hastily... relisted. --[[User:LjL|LjL]] ([[User talk:LjL|talk]]) 11:37, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
:: {{reply to|LjL}} I agree. Attempting to parse what [[User:Swarm|Swarm]] is saying, I think he may be mistaking guidelines (of which there are many) for policy (of which there are few) and substituting personal judgement for clear consensus. But the best any of us can do is employ our judgement, guided by guidelines and experience. The only statement I found on WP on the matter of local versus community consensus is this: "The term local consensus should also be avoided. Consensus is always understood to refer to those editors who take part in a discussion, whether current or historical. All consensus is local..." It's unfortunate so many areas of Wikipedia are being eaten away at in this fashion, but given the current system, everyone must use their own judgement and try to act in good faith.--[[Special:Contributions/69.204.153.39|69.204.153.39]] ([[User talk:69.204.153.39|talk]]) 14:59, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
| |||