Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart File System: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Comment: added references |
Biblioworm (talk | contribs) reply |
||
Line 40:
*'''Comment''' - I've added another two sources, one to an article on the ''Total Amiga'' magazine elaborating on how to make the best use of hard drives, and including some information about SFS previously not on our article (deleted files directory), and another to a mention on [[Ars Technica]] claiming that (as of 2008, when the article was written) the filesystem was still in active use among "Amiga fans". --[[User:LjL|LjL]] ([[User talk:LjL|talk]]) 12:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
**The Ars Technica magazine is just a brief one-line mention. The ''Total Amiga'' entry has some substance, but it's still not really enough to establish notability. It's the only (somewhat) good source on the article, and GNG says that multiple in-depth sources are expected. Think about it: if this subject was really notable, why must we press really hard through obscure fans-only magazines to find even a single one-paragraph mention? --[[User:Biblioworm|<span style="color:#6F4E37;">'''''Biblio'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Biblioworm|<span style="color:#6F4E37">'''''worm'''''</span>]] 15:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
| |||