Revision as of 01:26, 18 October 2015 edit 176.194.72.92 (talk) Oracle ACID question Tag: Possible vandalism ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:31, 18 October 2015 edit undo The Inappropriate Content Remover (talk \| contribs) 23 edits Automatically removing detected vandalism Next edit →
Line 6: }} {{User:WildBot/m04\|sect={{User:WildBot/m03\|1\|Comparison of relational database management systems#fn 2\|2\|#fn 2}}, {{User:WildBot/m03\|1\|Comparison of relational database management systems#idx 10 back\|Note (10):\|#idx 10 back}}, {{User:WildBot/m03\|1\|Comparison of relational database management systems#idx 11 back\|Note (11):\|#idx 11 back}}\|m04}} ~~== Why Oracle is marked as ACID compliant?~~ It doesn't provide ANSI SERIALIZABLE isolation level (allows non-serializable executions). So, it lacks full transaction isolation. Or, if ACID actually means nothing these days, why not just remove its line? ~~This is the citation from this wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapshot_isolation): "Snapshot isolation is called "serializable" mode in Oracle..."~~ ~~[[Special:Contributions/176.194.72.92\|176.194.72.92]] ([[User talk:176.194.72.92\|talk]]) 01:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC) anonymous~~ == How can MySQL possibly be ACID compliant? Surely it should be marked as "No" under ACID ==

Talk:Comparison of relational database management systems: Difference between revisions