Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/October: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:46, 27 October 2015

Revision as of 16:03, 27 October 2015

Line 8:

==={{tl|Minnesota-geo-stub}} split===

Very large stub cat at the moment. I just finished populating all the upmerged stubs and there's still 1,255 sitting in there (although now only 250~ of them use the generic, parent stub). There is now one which can be speedily given its own category: {{tl|CookCountyMN-geo-stub}}, which has [https://tools.wmflabs.org/templatecount/index.php?lang=en&name=CookCountyMN-geo-stub&namespace=10#bottom 68 transclusions] and so is eligible under S2S1. None of the others are, however, but I still think we need ''some'' to be given their own subcats, at least. There were a few more with 40+, but most sit in the region of 20~ transclusions. Is that enough to warrant their own subcat?

Now, there are already two subcats based on regions (the [[Twin Cities metropolitan area]] and the [[Arrowhead region]]) into which several counties are sorted, which would be a useful model to follow, but I'm not really seeing many other suitable ones to use as they aren't defined on county lines. Would having 62 subcats of the main area suffice?