Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/October: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:06, 5 November 2015

Revision as of 22:07, 5 November 2015

Line 13:

:Okay, been 5 days without objection, so I created the upmerged ones and the speedy eligible one, but I think the best model to follow is that for [[:Category:California geography stubs]] -- well-defined regions given their own category, which then have the upmerged templates feeding into them. As such I'll ask someone from [[WP:MINNESOTA]] if they could offer any advice as to how best we can sort out regional groupings... [[User:Buttons to Push Buttons|Buttons to Push Buttons]] ([[User talk:Buttons to Push Buttons|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Buttons to Push Buttons|contribs]]) 20:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

::This seems like a fine idea. I wish I could say there was a simple and generally agreed upon way to divide Minnesota up into regions but, sadly, there isn't any that I'm aware of. If you wanted to just be bold about it, [http://www.health.state.mn.us/oep/contact/teamsregions.html this map] through the Minnesota Department of Health meshes with my conception of it and also seems to fit some of the regions noted over in [[Geography of Minnesota]]. [[User:Nsteffel|Nsteffel]] ([[User talk:Nsteffel|talk]]) 18:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

::Having just run through some of that category to do some WikiProject tagging, another idea that came to mind would be splitting it out thematically. It looks like most of the stubs are either lakes, rivers/streams or populated places. Perhaps dividing it up along those sorts of criteria would be a little more cut-and-dried and still get things down to more manageable sizes? [[User:Nsteffel|Nsteffel]] ([[User talk:Nsteffel|talk]]) 22:07, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

===Aussie Rules competition stubs===