Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparallel processing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Transparallel processing: Answering questions |
||
Line 15:
(2) What would/could be the conflict-of-interest?
[[User:Gumum|Gumum]] ([[User talk:Gumum|talk]]) 17:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
: (1) Research published in an academic journal is a Primary Source. Primary sources have caused a lot of problems for us in the past, so we limit where and how they may be used. Our policy on [[WP:PRIMARY|Primary Sources]] begins: ''Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources. Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability''. The short summary of our [[WP:N|Notability]] policy requires an article topic ''has received significant coverage in ''(multiple)'' reliable sources that are independent of the subject''. [[Transparallel processing]] only cites primary sources by a single author, and as far as I could determine the additional sources in [[Transparallel mind]] don't mention the that concept. My Google search turned up no independent sources to support either topic.
: (2) Our [[W:COI|Conflict of Interest]] policy begins with ''Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial or other relationships''. Someone with a conflict of interest isn't the most impartial person to decide whether we should have an article, or how it should be written. I'll move further discussion of the COI software alert to usertalk. [[User:Alsee|Alsee]] ([[User talk:Alsee|talk]]) 15:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
| |||