Utente:L'inesprimibile nulla/Sandbox 2: differenze tra le versioni

Versione delle 12:57, 18 nov 2014

Versione delle 19:46, 18 nov 2014

Riga 52:

=== Materiale ===

[[File:18 - Stoà of Attalus Museum - Ostracism against Aristeides (483 BC) - Photo by Giovanni Dall'Orto, Nov 9 2009.jpg|thumb|Il frammento n° 18, un [[ostrakon]] danneggiato conservato al Museo della Stoà di Attalo, mostra la scritta "Aristide, figlio di Lisimaco" ({{lang-grc|ΑΡΙΣΤΕΙΔ[ΗΣ] ΛΥΣΙΜΑΧ[ΟΥ]}})]]

L'anno successivo, nel [[489 a.C.]], forse in conseguenza del suo ruolo non secondario durante lo scontro, venne fatto [[arconte eponimo]], come attestato dal [[Marmor Parium]], stele che permette la ricostruzione dei più importanti eventi dell'antichità, in quanto riporta il ciclo delle [[Olimpiadi]] e il nome degli arconti ad Atene.<ref>{{cita libro|titolo=Marmor Parium|capitolo=50}}.</ref> Secondo [[Plutarco]] nel [[483 a.C.|483]] o nel [[482 a.C.]], secondo [[Cornelio Nepote]] attorno al [[486 a.C.]], subì l'ostracismo. Secondo una prima versione, a permettere questa procedura furono i suoi influenti nemici, che si era addotto semplicemente per la sua scrupolosa onestà e per la sua rigida opposizione alla corruzione. Secondo una seconda interpretazione, nel contesto delle concause avrebbe maggior rilievo l'opposizione che egli aveva opposto alla politica marittima e democratica del rivale.

<small>'''[Guarda il testo di storia, per integrare col giudizio storiografico]'''</small>

Secondo la tradizione, scrisse il proprio nome su uno degli [[ostrakon|ostraka]], sotto la richiesta di un contadino analfabeta, ritenendo quest'ultimo, pur non sapendo chi fosse Aristide, che fosse inopportuno che un cittadino pretendesse di essere chiamato "Giusto" da parte dei compatrioti, dal momento che, secondo gli storici antichi, Temistocle aveva aizzato contro di lui la folla, inducendola a pensare che quell'appellativo fosse stato preteso da lui stesso. Come commenta [[Nepote]], la pena non venne scontata per intero, nonostante le fonti antiche attestino che nel [[480 a.C.]] la sentenza non fosse stata ancora revocata.<ref>{{cita|Erodoto|VIII, 79}}.</ref><ref>{{cita libro|autore=[[Demostene]]|titolo=Seconda contro Aristogitone|capitolo=DCCCII, 1, 16}}.</ref>

when he made his way from Aegina with news of the Persian movements for Themistocles at Salamis, and called on him to be reconciled. In the battle itself he did good service by dislodging the enemy, with a band raised and armed by himself, from the islet of Psyttaleia. In 479 he was strategus, the chief, it would seem, but not the sole (Plut. Arist. 11, but comp. 16 and 20, and Herod. ix.), and to him no doubt belongs much of the glory due to the conduct of the Athenians, in war and policy, during this, the most perilous year of the contest. Their replies to the proffers of Persia and the fears of Sparta Plutarch ascribes to him expressly, and seems to speak of an extant ψήφισμα Ἀριστείδου embracing them. (100.16.) So, too, their treatment of the claims of Tegea, and the arrangements of Pausanias with regard to their post in battle. He gives him further the suppression of a Persian plot among the aristocratical Athenians, and the settlement of a quarrel for the ἀριστεῖα by conceding them to Plataea (comp. however on this second point Hdt. 9.71); finally, with better reason, the consecration of Plataea and establishment of the Eleutheria, or Feast of Freedom. On the return to Athens, Aristeides seems to have acted in cheerful concert with Themistocles, as directing the restoration of the city (Heracl. Pont. 1); as his colleague in the embassy to Sparta, that secured for it its walls; as proposing, in accordance with his policy, perhaps also in consequence of changes in property produced by the war, the measure which threw open the archonship and areiopagus to all citizens alike. In 477, as joint-commander of the Athenian contingent under Pausanias, by his own conduct and that of his colleague and disciple, Cimon, he had the glory of obtaining for Athens the command of the maritime confederacy: and to him was by general consent entrusted the task of drawing up its laws and fixing its assessments. This first φόρος of 460 talents, paid into a common treasury at Delos, bore his name, and was regarded by the allies in after times, as marking their Saturnian age. It is, unless the change in the constitution followed it, his last recorded act. He lived, Theophrastus related, to see the treasury removed to Athens, and declared it (for the bearing of the words see Thirlwall's Greece, iii. p. 47) a measure unjust and expedient. During most of this period he was, we may suppose, as Cimon's coadjutor at home, the chief political leader of Athens. He died, according to some, in Pontus, more probably, however, at home, certainly after 471, the year of the ostracism of Themistocles, and very likely, as Nepos states, in 468. (See Clinton, F. H. in the years 469, 468.)