Content deleted Content added
→Edit request: header; not done |
Dinoguy1000 (talk | contribs) →WP:PERF: new section |
||
Line 11:
[[Special:Contributions/54.163.11.138|54.163.11.138]] ([[User talk:54.163.11.138|talk]]) 03:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.<!-- Template:ETp --> -- [[User:John of Reading|John of Reading]] ([[User talk:John of Reading|talk]]) 08:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
== [[WP:PERF]] ==
Why exactly is the documentation here making recommendations that ignore [[WP:PERF]]? Aiming to improve module performance on individual pages is fine, since all modules on a page share the same execution time limit, but worrying about the cumulative effects on the servers of a minor syntactic difference applied to hundreds of thousands of pages just reeks of blatantly and flippantly ignoring both the spirit and the letter of WP:PERF. Of particular relevance is the section [[WP:PERF#Editors still have a role to play]], and especially the line "Worry about performance if you can tell the difference yourself." (Note that I am not suggesting the module itself should be recoded, only that the documentation should be rewritten to not tell people to worry about the impacts of their coding choices when said impacts are only detectable when measured across thousands of pages.) <span class=nowrap>「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#00f>ディノ<span style=color:#080>奴]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#F90>千？！]]」<sup>[[Help:IJP|?]] · [[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|☎ Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 22:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
| |||