Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m refs using AWB |
||
Line 1:
[[Image:Flowchart of Phases of Parallel Randomized Trial - Modified from CONSORT 2010.png|thumb|250px|right|Flowchart of four phases (enrollment, intervention allocation, follow-up, and data analysis) of a parallel randomized trial of two groups, modified from the [[Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials|CONSORT 2010 Statement]]<ref name="Schulz-2010">{{Cite journal | author = Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; for the CONSORT Group |lastauthoramp=yes | title = CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials | journal = BMJ | volume = 340 | pages = c332 | year = 2010 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.c332 | url = http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/340/mar23_1/c332 | pmid = 20332509 | pmc = 2844940 }}</ref>]] In [[scientific method|science]], '''randomized experiments''' are the [[experiment]]s that allow the greatest reliability and validity of statistical estimates of treatment effects. Randomization-based inference is especially important in [[experimental design]] and in [[survey sampling]].
== Overview ==
Line 116:
</ref>
Randomized experiments were institutionalized in psychology and education in the late eighteen-hundreds, following the invention of randomized experiments by [[Charles Sanders Peirce|C. S. Peirce]].<ref>{{cite journal| author=[[Charles Sanders Peirce]] and [[Joseph Jastrow]]| year=1885|title=On Small Differences in Sensation| journal=Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences|volume=3|pages=73–83|url=http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Peirce/small-diffs.htm}} http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Peirce/small-diffs.htm</ref><ref>{{cite journal| doi=10.1086/354775| first=Ian |last=Hacking| authorlink=Ian Hacking | title=Telepathy: Origins of Randomization in Experimental Design|journal=[[Isis (journal)|
Outside of psychology and education, randomized experiments were popularized by [[R.A. Fisher]] in his book [[Statistical Methods for Research Workers]], which also introduced additional principles of experimental design.
Line 125:
==Empirical evidence that randomization makes a difference==
Empirically differences between randomized and non-randomized studies,<ref>{{cite journal| doi=10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2|
==See also==
Line 136:
{{Reflist}}
* {{cite book
|
|lastauthoramp=yes |title=Block designs: A Randomization approach, Volume '''I''': Analysis
|series=Lecture Notes in Statistics
|volume=150
Line 146:
}}
* {{cite book
|
|lastauthoramp=yes |title=Block designs: A Randomization approach, Volume '''II''': Design
|series=Lecture Notes in Statistics
|volume=170
|