Revision as of 21:28, 20 February 2016 edit Ttt74 (talk \| contribs) 496 edits →PHP as an example: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:06, 20 February 2016 edit undo Dsimic (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 39,664 edits →PHP as an example: Replied Next edit →
Line 28: :::::::::::::: Wouldn't SAPI be notable enough if only Apache used it, even if Microsoft's IIS didn't use it? It doesn't matter that the article was a stub, we have numerous even smaller stubs all around. — [[User:Dsimic\|Dsimic]] ([[User talk:Dsimic#nobold\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Dsimic\|contribs]]) 21:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC) ::::::::::::::: Stubs are not great: they just keep redundency everywhere and cause many waste of time and scattered content, instead of being unified. [[User:Ttt74\|Ttt74]] ([[User talk:Ttt74\|talk]]) 21:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC) :::::::::::::::: That's ''your'' opinion, to which I respectfully disagree. — [[User:Dsimic\|Dsimic]] ([[User talk:Dsimic#nobold\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Dsimic\|contribs]]) 22:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Server application programming interface: Difference between revisions