Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2016/February: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
new month |
→NEW PROPOSALS: River stubs |
||
Line 6:
<!--PLEASE READ [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals#Proposing_new_stub_types_-_procedure]] BEFORE PROPOSING A STUB TYPE. THE NUMBER OF ARTICLES THAT QUALIFY HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE RESULT OF YOUR PROPOSAL.-->
<!--Please add any new proposals for new stub templates / categories immediately after this line using header level 3-->
===River stubs===
There are [[:Category:Stub-Class_River_articles|over 23,000 stubs]] in [[WP:WikiProject Rivers|WikiProject Rivers]] and [http://tools.wmflabs.org/catscan3/catscan2.php?categories=Stub-Class+River+articles%0D%0AStub-Class+Brazil+articles&ns%5B1%5D=1&doit=1 2095] in Brazil alone. Has there been some decision made about not creating stub templates and categories like {{tl|Brazil-river-stub}} and [[:Category:Brazil river stubs]]? The only similar categories that I'm finding are for [[:Category:Queensland river stubs|Queensland]] and [[:Category:China river stubs|China]]. I'd be happy to build out the South American countries if there is some consensus to do this. [[User:Giso6150|giso6150]] ([[User talk:Giso6150|talk]]) 14:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
| |||