Talk:Encoding specificity principle: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:22, 2 March 2016

Revision as of 17:13, 3 March 2016

Line 13:

Agreed, example sentence to fix it:

Memory researchers such as Thomson and Tulving state that recall of memory is most effective when the context duringof encoding matches that of the retrieval. This "context" can be anything from the six senses to environmental cues.

Then this sentence should be omitted and another example should be given:

"The principle explains why a subject is able to recall a target word as part of an unrelated word pair at retrieval with much more accuracy when prompted with the unrelated word than if presented with a semantically related word that was not available during encoding." <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:RomainDecrop|RomainDecrop]] ([[User talk:RomainDecrop|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/RomainDecrop|contribs]]) 20:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->