Revision as of 20:12, 3 March 2016 edit Pelagic (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 6,634 edits →Accipitriformes stubs: comment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:16, 3 March 2016 edit undo Od Mishehu (talk \| contribs) 107,223 edits →Accipitriformes stubs Next edit →
Line 16: ::As for acceptance by bird experts, the article [[Accipitriformes]] details (with references) the adoption of this taxon by major ornithological associations, and the genetic research that led to this. [[User:Casliber\|Cas Liber]] and I have been updating taxoboxes to read "Order: Accipitriformes", and Wikispecies has used it for a long time. So I'm confident the taxon is sound. I've also posted a message at [[Wikipedia talk:Wikiproject Birds#Accipitriformes stub template]] inviting members to comment. ::[[User:Pelagic\|Pelagic]] ([[User talk:Pelagic\|talk]]) 20:09, 3 March 2016 (UTC) :::Creating ''any'' stub category for a valid full-level taxon (order, family) is uncontroversial, provided that there are at least 60 stubs to go there; upmerging any category, however, needs to go through CfD. [[User:Od Mishehu\|עוד מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu\|Od Mishehu]] 20:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ===River stubs===

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2016/February: Difference between revisions