Revision as of 04:57, 26 March 2016 edit So-retro-it-hurts (talk \| contribs) 1,507 edits →Intel didn't even have a processor when Relocatable Object Module was being generated ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:45, 26 November 2023 edit undo Matthiaspaul (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 137,876 edits →Is this talking about the same standard?: +a Next edit →
Line 8: *[https://archive.org/stream/byte-magazine-1977-11-rescan/1977_11_BYTE_02-11_Memory_Mapped_IO#page/n199/mode/2up/search/tdl Technical Forum:Technical Design Labs Relocatable Object Module Code Format], Volume 02 Number 11, November 1977, Byte Magazine, ''..format used by Technical Design Labs, originated by Neil Colvin. This text was given to us at the TDL booth at the National Computer Conference in Dallas last June, and offered as documentation of a standard which is in use by that firm, and is reportedly being examined for adoption by two other major software vendors in the personal computing marketplace.'' [[User:So-retro-it-hurts\|So-retro-it-hurts]] ([[User talk:So-retro-it-hurts\|talk]]) 04:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC) : No, it is talking about a hex file format similar to the [[Intel Hexadecimal Object File Format]]. : --[[User:Matthiaspaul\|Matthiaspaul]] ([[User talk:Matthiaspaul\|talk]]) 17:44, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Object Module Format (Intel): Difference between revisions