Revision as of 04:00, 24 August 2006 edit Fubar Obfusco (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 7,226 edits →[[User:Publicgirluk]] ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:02, 24 August 2006 edit undo Quarl (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 32,428 edits →[[User:Publicgirluk]]: «+"***I agree cropping is a good idea."» Next edit →
Line 562: Wikipedia's not censored, no, but Wikipedia isn't a porn site either. I'm no prude, but this sure tests my limits. --[[User:Jpgordon\|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon\|∇∆∇∆]]</small></sup> 01:43, 24 August 2006 (UTC) My other concern is that we need to be sure that, though the user kinda-caused it, she is not going to be heavily harrased over the images on and off Wiki. Cropping in order for some of the photos? [[User:Zscout370]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Zscout370\|(Return Fire)]]</sup></small> 01:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC) **I agree cropping is a good idea. <span class="user-sig user-Quarl"><i>—[[User:Quarl\|Quarl]] <sup>([[User Talk:Quarl\|talk]])</sup> <small>[[2006-08-24]] 04:03Z</small></i></span> : I don't think there is a serious issue of self-promotion since the user has made productive edits to unrelated articles. Someone should keep an eye out to make sure this doesn't turn into self-promotion, but as it is now, there isn't an issue. [[User:JoshuaZ\|JoshuaZ]] 02:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions