Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patafunctions: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:05, 16 April 2016

Revision as of 18:28, 16 April 2016

Line 6:

This is a very carefully written article with lots of references that seeks to prop up a single work by an artist. The problem is that the text is loaded with references to anything other than the work itself, which has very dubious notability as it is essentially a small run publication for an exhibtion. Article is a huge long essay essentially. Article creator has user name shockingly similar to Author of Patafunctions. With all the obfuscation goign on, like with COI. I suggest it is better ot blow this one out of the water and start over-- if needed. (the same may also be true of the gigantic [[Shaun Gladwell]] page. There seems to be abit of a campaign going on. ) [[User:HappyValleyEditor|HappyValleyEditor]] ([[User talk:HappyValleyEditor|talk]]) 15:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Visual arts|list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:GabeIglesia|GabeIglesia]] ([[User talk:GabeIglesia|talk]]) 15:16, 16 April 2016 (UTC)</small>

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia|list of Australia-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 18:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)</small>