Talk:Plain old Java object: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 6 discussions to Talk:Plain Old Java Object/Archives/2013. (BOT)
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Plain Old Java Object/Archives/2013. (BOT)
Line 12:
 
[[User:Pupitetris|Pupitetris]] ([[User talk:Pupitetris|talk]]) 19:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 
== JavaBeans are not POJO. "Contextual variations" chapter misleading? ==
I have objections as to JavaBeans being listed as a "variation" of a POJO object. The definition in the first section says ''The term "POJO" is mainly used to denote a Java object which does not follow any of the major Java object models, conventions, or frameworks''. By that definition, a JavaBean is not a POJO object (or a variation of it), since it introduces coding convention. I suggest the entire chapter is removed as it only causes confusion. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nilzor|Nilzor]] ([[User talk:Nilzor|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nilzor|contribs]]) 10:29, 15 May 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Transparently adding services ==