Deflagration to detonation transition: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Cap, italics for article name. Removed last sentence. I believe that it is wrong and that, in fact, the mechanisms are the same, although the reaction is nuclear rather than chemical. However, I'm not an expert; easiest just to remove.
m link directly to Buncefield fire and avoid capitalization quagmire.
Line 10:
* The [[Flixborough disaster]]
* The 1989 [[Phillips Disaster]] in Pasadena, Texas
* The damage observed in the Buncefield fire, see the [[2005 Hertfordshire Oil Storage TerminalBuncefield fire]]
 
The phenomenon is exploited in [[pulse detonation engine]]s because a detonation produces a more efficient combustion of the reactants than a deflagration does, i.e. giving a higher yields. Such engines typically employ a [[Shchelkin spiral]] in the [[combustion chamber]] to facilitate the deflagration to detonation transition.<ref>