Revision as of 23:09, 26 August 2006 edit Harperska (talk \| contribs) 65 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:25, 27 August 2006 edit undo Pi Delport (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 10,062 edits →Automator: comment Next edit →
Line 9: == Automator == Does [[Automator (software)\|Automator]] count as a VPL? It is clearly a visual scripting paradigm, but it is technically one dimensional as each node has 0..1 inputs and 0..1 outputs. Common sense says that Automator is a VPL, but the 2 dimensional requirement seems to exclude it. Therefore I would suggest a more direct definition of VPL, being "any [[programming language]] that lets users specify [[computer program\|programs]] by manipulating program elements graphically rather than by specifying them textually."[[User:Harperska\|Harperska]] 23:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC) : I don't think that that particular definition of dimensionality has any bearing on Automator's admissibility; it's clearly a visual (as opposed to textual) medium. --[[User:Piet Delport\|Piet Delport]] 00:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Visual programming language: Difference between revisions