Content deleted Content added
SMcCandlish (talk | contribs) |
SMcCandlish (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 92:
This sounds more like advertising than anything else. In fact the page seems to have been done-over by a Solaris/BSD flag-waver, what with two backwater OpenSolaris forks appearing at the top of the "implementations" list. [[User:Ris icle|Ris icle]] ([[User talk:Ris icle|talk]]) 14:47, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
:I would agree. But, if one starts looking for this kind of thing especially, in articles connected to the software industry and business automation, it would become a life's work. Not, that I'm discouraging anyone.[[User:Kckid|Kckid]] ([[User talk:Kckid|talk]]) 21:27, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
::Cleanup has to start somewhere. We have similar problems like this at [[Ubuntu (operating system)]], with flag-wavers sporadically opposing cleanup of the article. (It does not get into the fact that it's primarily a desktop OS, not a server one, aside from the Ubuntu Server variant; the current version's own documentation even says that much of it is outdated, and if you've ever tried to use Ubuntu as an enterprise server you'll very rapidly find out that most of the server-related docs are in fact years out of date. Other problems include citing non-independent, self-published and/or user-generated material right and left, including for potentially controversial claims. I've addressed these problems at its talk page). The overall problem of failure of our tech articles to abide by [[WP:NOT#ADVOCACY]] and [[WP:NPOV]] policies is widespread, and working to improve this should be done where it's needed. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — [[User:SMcCandlish|'''SMcCandlish''' ☺]] [[User talk:SMcCandlish|☏]] [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|¢]] ≽<sup>ʌ</sup>ⱷ҅<sub>ᴥ</sub>ⱷ<sup>ʌ</sup>≼ </span> 12:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
== expert-subject: why? ==
| |||