Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vue.js: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vue.js |
Mark viking (talk | contribs) →Vue.js: r |
||
Line 9:
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 04:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Vue.js]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
*'''Redirect''' to [[JavaScript templating]], where it is mentioned. I found two InfoWorld articles [http://www.infoworld.com/article/2998995/javascript/for-vuejs-components-power-interactive-web-interfaces.html],[http://www.infoworld.com/article/3063615/javascript/vuejs-lead-our-javascript-framework-is-faster-than-react.html], but both have a lot of quoting of primary sources and not much secondary commentary.--RS, but not in quite enough depth. The download stats are an assertion of significance sufficient to avoid a speedy deletion and perhaps enough to cast doubt on a prod, but not enough for notability, because you can't build an article on a download stat. I don't see any good merge target. A redirect to [[JavaScript templating]] would be reasonable, but a merge would be unbalance the article. VueJS or vue.js are reasonable search terms, so a redirect could be justified. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 21:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
| |||