Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BU Rob13: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
add |
→Oppose: comment |
||
Line 381:
#'''Oppose'''. I have been seeing the concerns about experience and maturity, and had been planning to give the candidate a pass. However, I just saw a very ill-considered comment directed at me at the current RfB, so I am moving from support to oppose. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 00:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - This will likely pass, and length of time and automated editing concerns don't concern me in this case - his work at CfD appears exemplary - but I find I agree with [[User:Tryptofish]] on 2 counts, one, that that comment (setting aside using the term "vote") didn't seem to [[WP:AGF|presume the good faith]] xaosflux seemed to give Tryptofish's perspective, but also the concerns about "tone", and examples of interaction with others, noted above. This falls to "is responsible" and "is civil/agf/eq" in my [[User:Jc37/RfA/Criteria|criteria]]. Perhaps with more experience? Time will tell, I suppose.- <b>[[User:Jc37|jc37]]</b> 00:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - I agree with <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">[[User:Stemoc|Ste]][[User talk:Stemoc|moc]]</span> and others on this one. The User is too much of a newbie for an adminship. He doesn't have enough time or experience dealing with other editors to have authority over them. If he has used another account in the past, let's see it. He should have at least a couple of years experience before adminship is considered. I don't think that's an unreasonable requirement to put on aspiring admins. [[User:Britcom|<font face="Rockwell, helvetica" color="red"><b><i>Br</i></b></font><font face="Rockwell, helvetica" color="blue"><b><i>it</i></b></font><font face="Rockwell, helvetica" color="black"><b>com</b></font>]] 01:55, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
=====Neutral=====
| |||