Revision as of 23:16, 3 September 2006 edit SalvNaut (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,444 edits →Edit request ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:19, 3 September 2006 edit undo Thomas B (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,929 edits →Edit request: comment Next edit →
Line 923: :::His work has not been published or peer-reviewed. I do not know what would give you the impression that it has. Peer-review denotes that a reputable, independent journal oversaw a process whereby qualified experts vigerously investigated the methodology used and conclusions reached. Jones' paper has not been subjected to anything even approximating peer-review. [[User:Levi P.\|Levi P.]] 23:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC) ::::'''Comment:''' Peer-review is a not a simple notion. In this particular it is highly controversial. Levi and Morton are restating the controversy. My request is to remove the controversial statement until the issue is settled. I.e., I think we should err on the side of '''not''' damaging Jones' reputation.--[[User:Thomas Basboll\|Thomas Basboll]] 23:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC) == Edit request ==

Talk:Steven E. Jones: Difference between revisions