Revision as of 16:38, 28 August 2016 edit Sandstein (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 191,071 edits →Size of the "controversy" section: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:36, 28 August 2016 edit undo Ahunt (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 229,521 edits →Size of the "controversy" section: reply Next edit →
Line 52: I think the "controversy" section could easily be pruned to a more manageable size, rather than consisting of a chronological account of every twist and turn of the issue, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unity_(user_interface)&oldid=prev&diff=736602332 others disagree]. Per [[WP:WEIGHT]], individual controversies shouldn't dominate the article. Opinions? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein\|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 16:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC) :I can see cutting the quotes and going to summaries instead to reduce this, but the story oof Unity is mostly the story of the controversies, especially the on-line search function. Furthermore the criticism has resulted in design changes and the elimination of the default internet search, so it has been notable to the development of the software. - [[User:Ahunt\|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt\|talk]]) 22:35, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Unity (user interface): Difference between revisions