Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subpopulation Algorithm based on Novelty: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 118.14.212.118 - "→Subpopulation Algorithm based on Novelty: " |
|||
Line 12:
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 10:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Subpopulation Algorithm based on Novelty]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
*'''Delete''' per above. Lacks sufficient context and at least needs a parent topic article before we get this deep. If it turns out to be important, we can revive it later, but right now it's kind of [[WP:NOCONTEXT]] [[User:Jergling|Jergling]] ([[User talk:Jergling|talk]]) 16:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' As per definition, notability is something famous or important. It is a new paradigm created in 2015 by a small group of researches, so it does not match the famous portion of the definition. However, it was published by a high impact journal (3.6) and the results reported does surpass all algorithms currently known in one of the hardest benchmarks of multi-objective, specially when the problem gets harder. Moreover, the basic paradigm of the approach is simple although completely different from anything done before. Thus, it seems important. So I vote to keep. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/118.14.212.118|118.14.212.118]] ([[User talk:118.14.212.118#top|talk]]) 10:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
| |||