Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subpopulation Algorithm based on Novelty: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:35, 24 September 2016

Revision as of 14:22, 24 September 2016

Line 15:

*'''Delete''', [[WP:TOOSOON]]. Based on a single recent publication that Google scholar lists as having only three citations; actually what it has is two self-citations and something that was published earlier and listed erroneously, so there are no independent references, even ones as minimal as a brief citation. Fails [[WP:NOR]], [[WP:GNG]], and probably [[WP:REFSPAM]]. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 20:19, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />

<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]^{[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]}</span> 01:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Subpopulation Algorithm based on Novelty]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' I had originally closed this as [[WP:SOFTDELETE]]. I've backed out my close per a request on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RoySmith&oldid=739691618#Deletion_of_the_Subpopulation_Algorithm_based_on_Novelty my talk page], and relisting this for another week's debate.<br />

<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 10:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Subpopulation Algorithm based on Novelty]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->

*'''Delete''' per above. Lacks sufficient context and at least needs a parent topic article before we get this deep. If it turns out to be important, we can revive it later, but right now it's kind of [[WP:NOCONTEXT]] [[User:Jergling|Jergling]] ([[User talk:Jergling|talk]]) 16:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' As per definition, notability is something famous or important. It is a new paradigm created in 2015 by a small group of researches, so it does not match the famous portion of the definition. However, it was published by a high impact journal (3.6) and the results reported does surpass all algorithms currently known in one of the hardest benchmarks of multi-objective, specially when the problem gets harder. Moreover, the basic paradigm of the approach is simple although completely different from anything done before. Thus, it seems important. So I vote to keep. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/118.14.212.118|118.14.212.118]] ([[User talk:118.14.212.118#top|talk]]) 10:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->{{SPA|118.14.212.118}}