Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydrogel micropatch sampling: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Sarahj2107 (talk | contribs) delete |
|||
Line 9:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 03:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete'''. Multiple independent reliable sources are required to establish [[WP:N|Notability]]. All sources appear to be written by Urban and colleagues. P.S. to [[User:Natriumchloratum|Natriumchloratum]], I almost complimented you as an excellent newbie because your username is redlinked, chuckle. Regarding chemists to comment on the issue, part of the key to Wikipedia is that editors (usually) don't need topic expertise. It's the job of scientists and Reliable Sources to evaluate subject matter and establish notability. Here we just need to evaluate sources and other policy issues. [[User:Alsee|Alsee]] ([[User talk:Alsee|talk]]) 01:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC) (Clarification: I meant I almost missed that you've been around a few years and that you have significant experience.) [[User:Alsee|Alsee]] ([[User talk:Alsee|talk]]) 01:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Of the four references in the article, all are journal articles published by the team that developed the technique. The fourth is just a link to a list of upcoming publications, but searching for the article title "Quantitative mass spectrometry of unconventional human biological matrices" ([http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/374/2079/20150380 abstract]) shows that it appears to be mainly about testing the specimens once you have them. Hydrogel micropatch sampling is not mentioned in the abstract so the use of this technique may be just a passing mention; I'm not prepared to pay for the full article to prove that though. I can't find any secondary sources mentioning it and would agree with Sadads that it is the non-notable project of one lab. [[User:Sarahj2107|Sarahj2107]] ([[User talk:Sarahj2107|talk]]) 21:09, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
| |||