Revision as of 13:47, 30 September 2016 edit Widefox (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 110,641 edits Assessment: Computing: class=Start, importance=Low, science=y, science-importance=Low, software=y, software-importance=Low (assisted) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:21, 29 May 2017 edit undo Cebus (talk \| contribs) 69 edits →Comparison to Haskell: new section Next edit →
Line 17: The lead begins "Miranda is a non-strict..." where "non-strict" forwards to the lazy evaluation page. This doesn't seem correct as there are many non-strict languages that aren't lazy. I haven't touched anything though as I'm not sure what the edit should be. --[[Special:Contributions/91.231.145.253\|91.231.145.253]] ([[User talk:91.231.145.253\|talk]]) 09:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC) == Comparison to Haskell == This article looks like an introduction to Haskell - the syntax is strikingly similar. Are there aspects and features of Miranda that are different and have not found their way into Haskell? --[[User:Cebus\|Cebus]] ([[User talk:Cebus\|talk]]) 07:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Miranda (programming language): Difference between revisions