Content deleted Content added
Line 57:
:I am so glad that you paid attention to this topic. Definitely, .net framework 2.0 is not part of Windows Server 2003, but an integrated part of Windows Server 2003 R2. I should have to make clear another thing, .net framework 1.1 SP1 is not delivered by SP2 of Windows Server 2003, but an integrated part too. Sorry to reply late, but late is better than never come. -- Aaron Janagewen [[Special:Contributions/139.210.139.160|139.210.139.160]] ([[User talk:139.210.139.160|talk]]) 13:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
::{{tq|"That's confirm 1.1 SP1 to have been delivered within the SP2 of Windows Server 2003."}}
::'''Bzzzt! Wrong.''' That only proves the support policy is aligned for the convenience of the supporter.
::{{tq|"And if .NET 2.0 is new in 2003 R2 [...]"}}
::Says who? The source says it isn't. It says it was included in 2003. Why don't you guys level that with Microsoft? Wikipedia is a downstream publisher anyway.
::Best regards,
::[[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 14:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
== What Does "DISTRIBUTED" Really Mean in This Template? ==
| |||