Talk:Visual programming language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:19, 7 September 2006

Revision as of 04:42, 2 November 2006

Line 13:

:: As Automator is clearly a visual language, and it is questionable whether befunge is (I would argue no), I am changing the definition to the one I proposed, and adding Automator to the list. [[User:Harperska|Harperska]] 05:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

== Portability/Source code? ==

Hi readers.

Does anyone of these offer finished diagrams

['''C/C++''', '''Pascal''', etc]

'''source code''' export for application portability?

Thanks for any help.

Bye, Ivano.