Revision as of 03:16, 17 October 2016 edit InternetArchiveBot (talk \| contribs) Bots, Pending changes reviewers 5,698,988 edits Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.5) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:47, 26 November 2016 edit undo 71.10.155.250 (talk) →How does it work: how do we know it is both safe and effective if it is unspecified? Next edit →
Line 48: ::<s>{{US patent\|0204949}}</s> and {{US patent\|8004802}}, both assigned to [[Eaton Corporation]] provide operational details and a few specifies. —[[user:EncMstr\|EncMstr]] ([[user talk:EncMstr\|talk]]) 09:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC) :::Whoops. 204949 is a 19th century patent for ~~muscial~~musical ~~isntruments~~instruments. The other one seems relevant. What was the first patent number supposed to be? --[[User:Wtshymanski\|Wtshymanski]] ([[User talk:Wtshymanski\|talk]]) 17:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC) ::::Hmmm, [http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=20080204949 this link] seems to have been intended, but it is a submission—not an actual patent. I have puzzled over it for a couple minutes, but I don't see a cross reference to a patent. —[[user:EncMstr\|EncMstr]] ([[user talk:EncMstr\|talk]]) 18:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC) If there is no published, open-source specification on how a AFCI is supposed to work, then how can a AFCI device be certified safe and effective to use? --[[Special:Contributions/71.10.155.250\|71.10.155.250]] ([[User talk:71.10.155.250\|talk]]) 22:46, 26 November 2016 (UTC) ==Playful circuit interrupter==

Talk:Arc-fault circuit interrupter: Difference between revisions