Automated Targeting System: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Rescuing 5 sources and tagging 1 as dead. #IABot (v1.2.5)
GreenC bot (talk | contribs)
m 3 archive templates merged to {{webarchive}} (WAM)
Line 11:
Lawsuits have been filed under both the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) seeking disclosure of information about ATS as well as records from ATS dossiers about individuals.
 
'''EFF v. Department of Homeland Security:''' On December 19, 2006, the Electronic Frontier Foundation's FOIA Litigation for Accountable Government (FLAG) project filed suit against the Department of Homeland Security under FOIA, demanding "immediate answers about an invasive and unprecedented data-mining system deployed on American travelers."<ref>[http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_12.php#005045 Press Releases: December, 2006 | Electronic Frontier Foundation<!-- Bot generated title -->] {{waybackwebarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061231080513/http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_12.php#005045 |date=20061231080513December 31, 2006 }}</ref>
 
'''Shearson v. Department of Homeland Security:''' In June 2006, Julia Shearson, Executive Director of the Cleveland Chapter of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) filed suit pro se against the DHS under the Privacy Act, seeking disclosure of records about herself from ATS and the correction of erroneous records falsely characterizing her as a terrorist.<ref>[http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2011/04/21/dhs-cant-opt-out-of-liability-for-violating-the-privacy-act/ DHS can't opt out of liability for violating the Privacy Act | PapersPlease.org: April 21, 2011]</ref>
Line 30:
The [[Association of Corporate Travel Executives]] (ACTE) requested an immediate suspension of the program, stating:
 
<blockquote>While ATS is undoubtedly raising red flags among privacy advocates and other groups that question the legality and intent of such programs, ACTE is primarily concerned with the economic impact this initiative will have on the business travel community. Delays, missed flights, canceled meetings, and potential arrests will generate staggering costs. In an ACTE survey dating to 2004, 97 percent of respondents stated that programs like this will have a negative impact on travel. This could very will be the impetus for businesses to fully explore alternatives to travel.<ref>[http://www.acte.org/resources/view_article.php?id=113 ACTE.org<!-- Bot generated title -->] {{waybackwebarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927022355/http://www.acte.org/resources/view_article.php?id=113 |date=20070927022355September 27, 2007 }}</ref></blockquote>
 
[[Bruce Schneier]], noted security specialist and writer, wrote about ATS:
Line 38:
The [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]] expressed their concerns:
 
<blockquote>The Automated Targeting System (ATS) will create and assign "risk assessments" to tens of millions of citizens as they enter and leave the country. Individuals will have no way to access information about their "risk assessment" scores or to correct any false information about them. But once the assessment is made, the government will retain the information for 40 years -- as well as make it available to untold numbers of federal, state, local, and foreign agencies in addition to contractors, grantees, consultants, and others.<ref>[http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_11.php#005030 Press Releases: November, 2006 | Electronic Frontier Foundation<!-- Bot generated title -->] {{waybackwebarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061202085952/http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_11.php#005030 |date=20061202085952December 2, 2006 }}</ref></blockquote>
 
The Identity Project (Papersplease.org) filed a series of formal comments <ref>[http://papersplease.org/wp/policy/#ATS Policy Analysis: ATS | PapersPlease.org]</ref> objecting to the ATS: