Content deleted Content added
→References: please. It's very convenient. |
|||
Line 1,192:
The statement above, and the one I'm thinking of, could be made into a nice and short section regarding this type of strategic thinking, past and present. -- [[User:Fyslee|Fyslee]] 07:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
::I agree, I tried to fit it in, but I think we have to get a section that starts to show the developement of the science with John Howard and Joe Janse at National, then we can show their POV as well. I still have not seen anything that makes me change my mind that DD was the original "mixer" and was in the middle of developing a science, but because of the AMA's threat to absorb everything into themselves (and because DD was not an MD), BJ decided to cloak it while DD wanted it to be scientific, but finally gave in to the fact that it had to go religious to avoid being called a science and absorbed by medicine (then getting arrested for practicing without a license). Once the threat was gone, it was too late, BJ had created his flock and they would defend it to the death. I want to avoid anything that would be OR, though, not because it would be wrong, but because I want to get it right. We don't need to point fingers at any group, though. I think they all think they are doing the right thing, they all just have different information. --[[User:Dematt|Dematt]]
==The most comprehensive article ever written==
| |||