Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004/Candidate statements: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →sannse: rm duplicate |
|||
Line 72:
To close, I say this: Like Mirv, I believe arbitration "should enforce community norms on those who will not abide by them willingly." [[User:Neutrality|[[User:Neutrality|<b>Neutrality</b>]] ([[User talk:Neutrality/Arbitration question|Any questions?]])]] 01:58, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)
==Raul654==
I'm a long time Wikipedian and current member of the arbitration committee. I was elected in August to fill in one of the seats left by the departure of Eloquence and Uninvited Company. I think since the election in August, the speed at which the arbcom handles matters (the primary complaint against it) has increased dramatically, without compromising the fairness of the process.
In general, I tend to have a lot of faith in sysops to enforce policy properly, and my arbitration committee decisions tend to reflect that. I expect all users to abide by policy (once they are made aware of it) and to treat other users with respect. I greatly dislike avowed POV pushers and I am vociferously against trolling.
As I said during the previous election, I think I'm qualified because I'm emminently aware of what goes on on the english wikipedia; that I have deep knowledge of the policies (I helped draft many of them); I've participated in the arbitration process both as participant ('prosector' - so to speak - in the case of now-banned user Platus Satire) and arbitrator; and finally, because I would like to continue to serve the community in this capacity.
I think my record speaks for itself, although I'd be more than happy to answer any questions. Ask on my [[user talk:Raul654|talk page]]. [[User:Raul654|→Raul654]] 02:41, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)
==Raul654==
|