Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Module talk:Iraqi insurgency detailed map) (bot |
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) from Module talk:Iraqi insurgency detailed map) (bot |
||
Line 127:
According to some sources Iraqi Forces entered the town of Tell Kaif, but where is it here in the map? --[[User:JapanerRusse|JapanerRusse]] ([[User talk:JapanerRusse|talk]]) 13:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
: It's a different spelling of Tell Keppe, north of Mosul. [[User:Schluppo|Schluppo]] ([[User talk:Schluppo|talk]]) 22:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
== Whats the situation in Bakhdida? ==
Can sombody tell me what the current situation is in Bakhdida? The town is shown here as contested since some days now. Are there any sources when the battle in Bakhdida started and sources about the current situation to back up its contested status here? --[[User:JapanerRusse|JapanerRusse]] ([[User talk:JapanerRusse|talk]]) 11:56, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
:There were (apparently) false/premature reports about Iraqi Army having taken Bakhdida about five days ago. Today, Almasdar claims that Iraqi Army (re?)entered the town: https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/iraqi-army-assyrian-forces-enters-strategic-town-near-mosul/. For now, we should keep it as contested between IS and Iraqi Army. [[User:Schluppo|Schluppo]] ([[User talk:Schluppo|talk]]) 12:07, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
:: AlMasdar is a pro-shia source that cannot be used as source for pro-gov gains. Its simply against the rules. They have been caught in pro-gov lies many times, although telling the truth this time. Still they should never be used for pro-gov gains. Use kurdish or mainstream media for that. Rudaw confirms Bakhdida fighting. [[User:Mozad655|Mozad655]] ([[User talk:Mozad655|talk]]) 12:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
:::I wouldn't call it pro-Shia or pro-Iraqi. Rather it is pro-Assad and anti-ISIL. [[Special:Contributions/117.199.84.187|117.199.84.187]] ([[User talk:117.199.84.187|talk]]) 14:10, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
== Villages east of Mosul taken by joint forces ==
Some villages and towns should be red/yellow because they were captured by both Iraqi and Kurdish (Bartilla and Topzawa). [http://www.basnews.com/index.php/en/news/iraq/307071] --[[User:Ahmedo Semsurî|Ahmedo Semsurî]] ([[User talk:Ahmedo Semsurî|talk]]) 21:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Ahmedo, both Iraqi and Kurdish forces are taking part in the battle. But Nineveh and its administration officially belongs to the government. But if others users are ok with it, then I'm ok with it as well. If not, then I don't think we should change them. Let's go with the consensus. [[Special:Contributions/117.207.148.35|117.207.148.35]] ([[User talk:117.207.148.35|talk]]) 21:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
::Yes. But if Peshmergas are present in the village (check https://twitter.com/KawlF/status/790663251654770688), I think we should take them to red/yellow as Khurmatu. Also, what belongs to the government officially is irrelevant, otherwise we should change everything Kurdish-controlled not in Dohuk, Sulaymaniyah and Erbil provinces as red. --[[User:Ahmedo Semsurî|Ahmedo Semsurî]] ([[User talk:Ahmedo Semsurî|talk]]) 21:28, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
That's not what I mean. In Dohuk, Kirkuk etc. the Kurdistan controls the local government. But there is no local government in these newly captured villages on the east of Mosul, besides everyone fled in 2014. Also the Kurds haven't stated they are annexing these villages as well. [[Special:Contributions/117.207.148.35|117.207.148.35]] ([[User talk:117.207.148.35|talk]]) 21:35, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
It is a confusing situation. But if others are ok with it, I'm ok with it. [[Special:Contributions/117.207.148.35|117.207.148.35]] ([[User talk:117.207.148.35|talk]]) 21:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
:Actually, the whole Kirkuk province is officially part of Iraq and not the KRG and places like Shekan or Alqosh behind the frontlines in Nineveh Governorate are also definitely to be marked yellow as they are controlled by the Peshmerga. However, if the marks are too small, we should not use two colours, because it's barely visible then.--[[User:Ermanarich|Ermanarich]] ([[User talk:Ermanarich|talk]]) 22:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Kirkuk is officially a part, but its been occupied by Peshmerga since 2014 and they claim it. [[Special:Contributions/117.207.148.35|117.207.148.35]] ([[User talk:117.207.148.35|talk]]) 23:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
| |||