Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by John of Reading (talk): Undo self - that's not a job advert - I lost track of my browser tabs and reverted the wrong one. (TW) |
→NPOV is not necessairly objective: new section |
||
Line 16:
* Somehow "policies and guidelines" feels really dry and may reduce readers. Perhaps there are other main titles that are less intimidating like "Principles" or even "content and conduct" or something?
What do other people think? <span class="nowrap">[[User:Evolution and evolvability|T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)]]<sup>[[User talk:Evolution and evolvability|talk]]</sup></span> 11:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
== NPOV is not necessairly objective ==
:''Neutral point-of-view (or NPOV) means content is written objectively and without bias, merely presenting the facts and notable viewpoints of others.''
[[WP:NPOV]] page avoids any use of the word ''objective''. Actually, the only use is to respond to the misunderstanding where NPOV might be thought of as a state of objectivity.
Let's find a better way to present such an important part of future Wikipedians orientation to WP. [[User:Calexit|Calexit]] ([[User talk:Calexit|talk]]) 23:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
| |||